Telos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Botwinick, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Fascist Past of Italian Intellectuals

On Avicenna

Aryeh Botwinick

Avicenna seems to converge with the negative theological understandings I have previously made central to my reading of Sura II.1 He maps the dynamics of theological inquiry in such a way that negative theology appears as the most appropriate conclusion to be drawn from the argument. He says that "contingent beings end in a Necessary Being" and that "the Necessary Being does not resemble any other thing in any respect whatsoever." He goes on to reject the imputation of literally conceived attributes to Necessary Being—i.e., to God: "If it were to be stated that His Attributes are not an augmentation...







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by Telos Press.