|
|
||||||||
In Otherwise than Being, Emmanuel Levinas pursues much more audaciously and systematically than he does in Totality and Infinity the transcendental phenomenological mode of philosophizing inaugurated by Husserl and extended by Heidegger.1 The constitutive categories of this phenomenology—"substitution," "passivity," and "incarnation"—do not even appear in the index to Totality and Infinity. While Levinas revises and criticizes the work of his two famous predecessors, there is no mistaking his intent to contribute to the same philosophical genre that Husserl has created and that Heidegger has rearticulated with his own preferred set of subcategories. As Leszek Kolakowski has argued, this project is...
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |