Telos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Amico, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Laws and Concepts

Robert D'Amico

One of the first philosophical conversations I had with Paul Piccone concerned the issues in this paper. He was a stalwart critic of positivism. Specifically, he argued that not only were the social and natural sciences radically distinct, but that there were no such thing as social sciences (in spite of his brief sojourn into sociology). He of course also rejected social-scientific laws, but for largely ideological reasons. As I continued to think about this problem, we came back to it many times over the years. This essay summarizes some of the debate and, I hope, exemplifies what Telos was...







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by Telos Press.