Telos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de la Grange, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Special Section on Terrorism

The Changing Character of Terrorism and its Implications

Teodoro Klitsche de la Grange

I

What is most striking about the September 11 catastrophe is the lack of any clear and public demands. To attach demands to war acts is normal in partisan wars and in terrorism for two reasons: a) it demonstrates one's ability to hit and destroy, i.e., to have power; and b) it constitutes a prerequisite for gaining legitimation in order to negotiate—the kind of negotiations that transform the partisan or the terrorist into a political interlocutor (in the full sense of the word) with whom it is possible to end the war and work out a peace.

Actually, this second...







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by Telos Press.